On the docketEvery caseComing upCompaniesKindsWhat changedMethod

Data and AI in court

FTC: Nissan consumer protection case

Federal Trade Commission · decided Aug 19, 2026 · Active

Decision

Unverified Found by the weekly run; nobody has checked the source yet.

FTC, Connecticut Secure $4 Million Settlement with Manchester City Nissan Over Deceptive Fees Allegations

The case

Against
Nissan
Regulator
Federal Trade Commission
Decided
Aug 19, 2026
Status
ActiveAnnounced in a press release; not yet read by an editor.

History

1 dated entry

  • DecisionAug 1948d ago

    FTC, Connecticut Secure $4 Million Settlement with Manchester City Nissan Over Deceptive Fees Allegations

Related cases

  • FTC v. Uber (Uber One subscriptions)

    ActiveNotice is hereby given that the Settlement Conference previoOct 13Notice is hereby given that the Settlement Conference previo in 7d

    N.D. Cal. · Consumer protection · filed Apr 2025

  • A.C. v. Altman (Tumbler Ridge)

    ActiveMotion to dismiss hearingNov 5Motion to Dismiss Hearing in 30d

    N.D. Cal. · Consumer protection · filed Sep 2026

  • Kahn v. Anthropic

    ActiveMotion to dismiss hearingNov 6Motion to Dismiss Hearing in 31d

    N.D. Cal. · Consumer protection · filed Jun 2026

  • Gavalas v. Google (Gemini)

    ActiveFurther case management conferenceDec 2Further Case Management Conference in 57d

    N.D. Cal. · Consumer protection · filed Mar 2026

  • DOJ: Natural

    Active

    DOJ · Consumer protection · filed Oct 2026

  • California AG: RealPage

    Active

    California Attorney General · Consumer protection · filed Oct 2026

  • DOJ: Tesla

    Active

    DOJ · Consumer protection · filed Sep 2026

  • Texas AG v. TikTok: deceptive child safety claims

    Decided

    Texas Attorney General · Consumer protection · filed Sep 2026

Caption and links

FTC, Connecticut Secure $4 Million Settlement with Manchester City Nissan Over Deceptive Fees Allegations

Also onbreaches·Stories