Skip to content

FTC: Instacart, deceptive fees and Instacart+ consumer protection case

US Federal Trade Commission · decided Dec 18, 2025 · Settled

The FTC alleged Instacart deceived shoppers about fees and charged for Instacart+ without express informed consent.

The case

Against
Instacart
Regulator
US Federal Trade Commission
Decided
Dec 18, 2025
Status
Settled
Outcome
Instacart agreed to pay USD 60 million in consumer refunds.
Amount
$60 million

History

1 dated entry
DateEntry
Dec 18, 2025Decision: FTC: Instacart, deceptive fees and Instacart+
WhenCase
Oct 13Notice is hereby given that the Settlement Conference previo in 18dnext dateFTC v. Uber (Uber One subscriptions)Notice is hereby given that the Settlement Conference previoActiveConsumer protectionN.D. Cal.
Nov 5Motion to Dismiss Hearing in 41dnext dateA.C. v. Altman (Tumbler Ridge)Motion to Dismiss HearingActiveConsumer protectionN.D. Cal.
Nov 6Motion to Dismiss Hearing in 42dnext dateKahn v. AnthropicMotion to Dismiss HearingActiveConsumer protectionN.D. Cal.
Dec 2Further Case Management Conference in 68dnext dateGavalas v. Google (Gemini)Further Case Management ConferenceActiveConsumer protectionN.D. Cal.
Sep 10Filed 15d agofiledTexas AG v. TikTok: deceptive child safety claimsDecidedConsumer protectionTexas Attorney General
Aug 26Filed 30d agofiledTexas AG v. Meta: child safety settlementSettledConsumer protectionTexas Attorney Generalover $1 billion
May 22Filed 4mo agofiledTexas AG v. Discord: child safetyActiveConsumer protectionTexas Attorney General
Dec 29, 2025Filed 9mo agofiledLyons v. OpenAI (Soelberg)ActiveConsumer protectionN.D. Cal.
Caption and links

Federal Trade Commission v. Maplebear Inc. (Instacart)

Lawsuit updates by email

Tuesdays, only in weeks with rulings, filings or hearings in data and AI cases.

Double opt-in. Unsubscribe any time.