Skip to content

In re Zoom Video Communications Securities Litigation securities case

US District Court, Northern District of California · 3:20-cv-02396 · filed Apr 8, 2020 · Settled

Investors alleged Zoom misled them about its data privacy and security measures during the early pandemic boom.

The case

Defendants
Zoom
Court
US District Court, Northern District of California
Docket
3:20-cv-02396
Filed
Apr 8, 2020
Status
SettledParties signed a settlement stipulation in July 2023.

History

1 dated entry
DateEntry
Apr 8, 2020Filing: Complaint filed: Brams v. Zoom Video Communications, Inc.
WhenCase
Nov 17Final Approval Motion Hearing in 53dnext dateIn re Seagate Technology Holdings plc Securities LitigationFinal Approval Motion HearingActiveSecuritiesN.D. Cal.
May 20, 2027Motion Hearing in 8monext dateIn re NVIDIA Corporation Securities LitigationMotion HearingActiveSecuritiesN.D. Cal.
Jul 10Filed 77d agofiledBaldwin v. Intuit Inc.ActiveSecuritiesN.D. Cal.
Feb 24Filed 7mo agofiledPatel v. Snowflake Inc.ActiveSecuritiesN.D. Cal.
Feb 3Filed 8mo agofiledBarrows v. Oracle CorporationActiveSecuritiesD. Del.
Jan 12Filed 8mo agofiledMasaitis v. CoreWeaveActiveSecuritiesD. N.J.
Oct 31, 2025Filed 11mo agofiledIn re Synopsys, Inc. Securities LitigationActiveSecuritiesN.D. Cal.
Aug 22, 2025Filed 13mo agofiledLiggett v. C3.aiDismissedSecuritiesN.D. Cal.
Caption and links

Brams v. Zoom Video Communications, Inc.

Full docket on CourtListener

Also onQuarterly·Paydays

Lawsuit updates by email

Tuesdays, only in weeks with rulings, filings or hearings in data and AI cases.

Double opt-in. Unsubscribe any time.