Skip to content
Lawsuits.

Uber v. Aslam (UK Supreme Court) employment case

UK Supreme Court · [2021] UKSC 5 · filed Oct 28, 2015 · Decided

Docket

Drivers led by Yaseen Aslam and James Farrar argued they were workers, not self-employed contractors.

The case

Plaintiffs
Yaseen Aslam
Defendants
Uber
Court
UK Supreme Court
Docket
[2021] UKSC 5
Filed
Oct 28, 2015
Status
Decided
Outcome
The UK Supreme Court ruled in February 2021 that Uber drivers are workers entitled to minimum wage and holiday pay.

History

1 dated entry
DateEntry
Oct 28, 2015Filing: Complaint filed: Uber BV v. Aslam

Related cases

WhenCase
Oct 13Notice is hereby given that the Settlement Conference previo in 18dnext dateFTC v. Uber (Uber One subscriptions)Notice is hereby given that the Settlement Conference previoActiveConsumer protectionN.D. Cal.
Aug 21Filed 35d agofiledDutch DPA fine: Uber, automated driver deactivationDecidedPrivacyDutch Data Protection Authority (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens)EUR 824,990,000
Jan 28Filed 8mo agofiledLowbruck v. Dell (401(k))ActiveEmploymentW.D. Tex.
Nov 21, 2025Filed 10mo agofiledGruendel v. Figure AIActiveEmploymentN.D. Cal.
Aug 26, 2024Filed 2.1y agofiledDutch DPA fine: Uber, driver data transfers to the USDecidedPrivacyDutch Data Protection Authority (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens)EUR 290 million
Mar 4, 2024Filed 2.6y agofiledAgrawal v. MuskSettledEmploymentN.D. Cal.
Sep 28, 2023Filed 3y agofiledEEOC v. TeslaActiveEmploymentN.D. Cal.
Jul 12, 2023Filed 3.2y agofiledMcMillian v. Musk (Twitter severance)DismissedEmploymentN.D. Cal.
Caption and links

Uber BV v. Aslam

Also onQuarterly·Paydays

Lawsuit updates by email

Tuesdays, only in weeks with rulings, filings or hearings in data and AI cases.

Double opt-in. Unsubscribe any time.