Skip to content

Reckstin Family Trust v. C3.ai securities case

US District Court, Northern District of California · 4:22-cv-01413 · filed Mar 4, 2022 · Active

Shareholders allege C3.ai misled investors about its business and its Baker Hughes relationship around its December 2020 IPO.

The case

Defendants
C3.ai, Baker Hughes
Court
US District Court, Northern District of California
Docket
4:22-cv-01413
Filed
Mar 4, 2022
Status
ActiveCourt dismissed most claims in March 2026; an IPO registration statement claim about a reseller survives.

History

1 dated entry
DateEntry
Mar 4, 2022Filing: Complaint filed: The Reckstin Family Trust v. C3.ai, Inc.
WhenCase
Nov 17Final Approval Motion Hearing in 53dnext dateIn re Seagate Technology Holdings plc Securities LitigationFinal Approval Motion HearingActiveSecuritiesN.D. Cal.
May 20, 2027Motion Hearing in 8monext dateIn re NVIDIA Corporation Securities LitigationMotion HearingActiveSecuritiesN.D. Cal.
Jul 10Filed 77d agofiledBaldwin v. Intuit Inc.ActiveSecuritiesN.D. Cal.
Feb 24Filed 7mo agofiledPatel v. Snowflake Inc.ActiveSecuritiesN.D. Cal.
Feb 3Filed 8mo agofiledBarrows v. Oracle CorporationActiveSecuritiesD. Del.
Jan 12Filed 8mo agofiledMasaitis v. CoreWeaveActiveSecuritiesD. N.J.
Oct 31, 2025Filed 11mo agofiledIn re Synopsys, Inc. Securities LitigationActiveSecuritiesN.D. Cal.
Aug 22, 2025Filed 13mo agofiledLiggett v. C3.aiDismissedSecuritiesN.D. Cal.
Caption and links

The Reckstin Family Trust v. C3.ai, Inc.

Full docket on CourtListener

Also onQuarterly

Lawsuit updates by email

Tuesdays, only in weeks with rulings, filings or hearings in data and AI cases.

Double opt-in. Unsubscribe any time.