Lawsuitsby GlyphNetlist v. Samsung (license agreement) contract case
Brought by
v.
Defendants
Netlist says Samsung breached their 2015 joint development and license agreement, letting Netlist terminate the patent license.
The case
- Court
- US District Court, Central District of California
- Docket
- 8:20-cv-00993
- Filed
- May 28, 2020
- Status
- ActiveSamsung's motion for a new trial pending after a March 2025 verdict.
- Outcome
- A jury found for Netlist in March 2025 on its claim that Samsung breached their joint development and license agreement.
History
1 dated entryComplaint filed: Netlist Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Source
Related cases
Nippon Life Insurance sued v. 
OpenAINippon Life alleges ChatGPT induced a breach of a settlement agreement by helping a former claimant file a motion to reopen a settled lawsuit.N.D. Ill.
Qualcomm Incorporated sued v. Arm Ltd.Sued for breach of contract.D. Del.
Google sued v. 
SerpApiGoogle alleges SerpApi circumvents its anti-scraping protections to harvest and resell search results, in violation of the DMCA.N.D. Cal.
In re Aylo Corporation Data Breach LitigationSued for breach of contract.W.D. Tex.
In Re Oracle Corporation Data Breach LitigationSued for breach of contract.W.D. Tex.
Amazon sued v. 
PerplexityAmazon alleges Perplexity's Comet browser agent covertly accesses customer Amazon accounts and shops while disguised as a human user, in violation of computer fraud laws.N.D. Cal.
Palantir Technologies, Inc. sued v. JainA contract case.S.D. N.Y.
Reddit sued v. SerpApi and PerplexityReddit alleges SerpApi, Oxylabs and AWMProxy scraped Reddit content from Google results at industrial scale and that Perplexity bought the data for its answer engine.S.D. N.Y.
Amazon sued v.