Skip to content

Massachusetts v. Uber and Lyft employment case

Massachusetts Superior Court, Suffolk County · filed Jul 9, 2020 · Settled

The Massachusetts Attorney General alleged Uber and Lyft misclassified drivers as independent contractors.

The case

Defendants
Uber
Court
Massachusetts Superior Court, Suffolk County
Filed
Jul 9, 2020
Status
Settled
Outcome
Uber and Lyft settled in June 2024.

History

1 dated entry
DateEntry
Jul 9, 2020Filing: Complaint filed: Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
WhenCase
Oct 13Notice is hereby given that the Settlement Conference previo in 18dnext dateFTC v. Uber (Uber One subscriptions)Notice is hereby given that the Settlement Conference previoActiveConsumer protectionN.D. Cal.
Aug 21Filed 35d agofiledDutch DPA fine: Uber, automated driver deactivationDecidedPrivacyDutch Data Protection Authority (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens)EUR 824,990,000
Jan 28Filed 8mo agofiledLowbruck v. Dell (401(k))ActiveEmploymentW.D. Tex.
Nov 21, 2025Filed 10mo agofiledGruendel v. Figure AIActiveEmploymentN.D. Cal.
Aug 26, 2024Filed 2.1y agofiledDutch DPA fine: Uber, driver data transfers to the USDecidedPrivacyDutch Data Protection Authority (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens)EUR 290 million
Mar 4, 2024Filed 2.6y agofiledAgrawal v. MuskSettledEmploymentN.D. Cal.
Sep 28, 2023Filed 3y agofiledEEOC v. TeslaActiveEmploymentN.D. Cal.
Jul 12, 2023Filed 3.2y agofiledMcMillian v. Musk (Twitter severance)DismissedEmploymentN.D. Cal.
Caption and links

Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Also onQuarterly·Paydays

Lawsuit updates by email

Tuesdays, only in weeks with rulings, filings or hearings in data and AI cases.

Double opt-in. Unsubscribe any time.