Massachusetts v. Uber and Lyft employment case

Docket

Brought by

MAMassachusetts Attorney General

v.

Defendants

Uber

The Massachusetts Attorney General alleged Uber and Lyft misclassified drivers as independent contractors.

Related cases

EmploymentActiveUnverifiedfiled Oct 2026BBrown sued v. Baker Hughes Energy Services LLCSued for employment discrimination.W.D. Okla.EmploymentActiveUnverifiedfiled Sep 2026WWheeler sued v. Dow Jones & Company, Inc.Sued for job discrimination (race).N.D. Ga.PrivacyDecidedfiled Aug 2026Dutch DPA fine: Uber, automated driver deactivationThe Dutch DPA, working with the CNIL on a French drivers' complaint, found Uber used fully automated decisions to temporarily or permanently deactivate drivers over suspected fraud or low ratings and did not properly inform them.EUR 824,990,000Dutch Data Protection Authority (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens)EmploymentActiveUnverifiedfiled Jul 2026KKoester sued v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.Sued under the Family and Medical Leave Act.N.D. Tex.EmploymentActiveUnverifiedfiled Jul 2026RRwabukamba sued v. Intel CorporationA civil rights (employment) case.D. Or.EmploymentActiveUnverifiedfiled Jun 2026MMeling sued v. SAP Global Marketing Inc.Sued for fair labor standards.S.D. Fla.EmploymentActiveUnverifiedfiled Jun 2026PPaulsen sued v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise CoA civil rights (jobs) case.D. Colo.EmploymentActiveUnverifiedfiled May 2026DDAVIS sued v. SAP AMERICA, INC.Sued for job discrimination (race).E.D. Pa.