Skip to content

iyO v. OpenAI (io trademark) patent case

US District Court, Northern District of California · 3:25-cv-04861 · filed Jun 9, 2025 · Active

Hearing-device startup iyO alleges OpenAI and Jony Ive's io Products infringe its IYO trademark with the io name for their AI hardware venture.

The case

Plaintiffs
iyO
Defendants
io Products, OpenAI
Court
US District Court, Northern District of California
Docket
3:25-cv-04861
Filed
Jun 9, 2025
Status
ActiveA temporary restraining order in June 2025 barred OpenAI from using the io name; the Ninth Circuit affirmed.

History

2 dated entries
DateEntry
Jul 27Ruling: ORDER 195 : The Court has received a notice of settlement in principle
Jun 9, 2025Filing: Complaint filed: IYO, Inc. v. IO Products, Inc.
WhenCase
Nov 5Motion to Dismiss Hearing in 41dnext dateA.C. v. Altman (Tumbler Ridge)Motion to Dismiss HearingActiveConsumer protectionN.D. Cal.
Nov 5Initial Case Management Conference in 41dnext dateTed Entertainment v. OpenAIInitial Case Management ConferenceActiveCopyrightN.D. Cal.
Sep 16Filed 9d agofiledTimes Publishing Co. v. Microsoft and OpenAIActiveCopyrightS.D. N.Y.
Aug 14Filed 42d agofiledSullivan v. OpenAIActiveCopyrightS.D. N.Y.
Jun 24Filed 93d agofiledRichner Communications v. MicrosoftActiveCopyrightS.D. N.Y.
May 1Filed 5mo agofiledCarreyrou v. OpenAIActiveCopyrightS.D. N.Y.
Mar 13Filed 6mo agofiledEncyclopaedia Britannica v. OpenAIActiveCopyrightS.D. N.Y.
Mar 10Filed 7mo agofiledGracenote Media Services v. OpenAIActiveCopyrightS.D. N.Y.
Caption and links

IYO, Inc. v. IO Products, Inc.

Full docket on CourtListener

Lawsuit updates by email

Tuesdays, only in weeks with rulings, filings or hearings in data and AI cases.

Double opt-in. Unsubscribe any time.