CNIL fine: Amazon Europe Core, cookies privacy case
Regulator
CNIL
acted against
Against
The CNIL found amazon.fr placed advertising cookies automatically without prior consent or adequate information.
The case
- Regulator
- CNIL (Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertes)
- Decided
- Dec 7, 2020
- Status
- Decided
- Outcome
- The CNIL fined Amazon Europe Core EUR 35 million and issued an injunction.
- Amount
- EUR 35 million
History
1 dated entryCNIL fine: Amazon Europe Core, cookiesSource
Related cases
United States sued v.
Cerebral (health data for ads)The FTC alleged the telehealth firm shared sensitive health data with third parties for advertising, failed to secure it and made cancellation difficult.$7 millionJury trialS.D. Fla.filed Apr 2024
Irish Data Protection Commission: GoogleThe Irish Data Protection Commission fines Google 403 000 000 EUR following Inquiry into Google’s processing of location dataIrish DPCIsbell sued v.
SunoRecording artists including Jason Isbell and David Lowery allege Suno's generator reproduces their voices, names and likenesses without consent, pleading BIPA and state right-of-publicity claims.D. Mass.
Dutch DPA fine: Uber, automated driver deactivationThe Dutch DPA, working with the CNIL on a French drivers' complaint, found Uber used fully automated decisions to temporarily or permanently deactivate drivers over suspected fraud or low ratings and did not properly inform them.EUR 824,990,000Dutch Data Protection Authority (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens)
EU Commission: AWS and Azure DMA cloud investigationThe Commission told Amazon and Microsoft it preliminarily considers AWS and Azure should be designated as gatekeeper cloud services despite not meeting the DMA's quantitative thresholds.European CommissionTexas AG acted against v.
Meta and WhatsApp: encryption claimsTexas sued Meta and WhatsApp alleging they misled users about end-to-end encryption and the privacy of WhatsApp messages.Texas Attorney GeneralFlowers sued v.
MicrosoftAlleges Microsoft's Copilot and other voice products captured users' biometric voiceprints without BIPA consent.N.D. Ill.Amer sued v.
ElevenLabsIllinois plaintiffs allege ElevenLabs captured biometric voiceprints from real voices to build its voice AI without BIPA consent.N.D. Ill.