Skip to content

Apple v. Masimo (D. Del.) patent case

US District Court, District of Delaware · 1:22-cv-01377 · filed Oct 20, 2022 · Active

Apple accused the Masimo W1 watch of infringing Apple utility and design patents; Masimo countersued for monopolization and patent infringement.

The case

Plaintiffs
Apple
Defendants
Masimo
Court
US District Court, District of Delaware
Docket
1:22-cv-01377
Filed
Oct 20, 2022
Status
ActiveMasimo counterclaims still to be tried.
Outcome
A jury found in October 2024 that a discontinued Masimo watch and charger infringed two Apple design patents and awarded $250.
Amount
$250

History

1 dated entry
DateEntry
Oct 20, 2022Filing: Complaint filed: Apple Inc. v. Masimo Corporation
WhenCase
Jul 26, 2027Further Case Management Conference in 10monext dateHendrix v. AppleFurther Case Management ConferenceActiveCopyrightN.D. Cal.
Dec 22, 2025Filed 9mo agofiledAGCM: Apple ATT fineDecidedAntitrustAutorita Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM)EUR 98 million
Oct 22, 2025Filed 11mo agofiledCMA: Apple mobile platform strategic market statusActiveAntitrustUK CMA
Oct 9, 2025Filed 12mo agofiledMartinez-Conde v. AppleActiveCopyrightN.D. Cal.
Aug 25, 2025Filed 13mo agofiledX Corp. and xAI v. Apple and OpenAIActiveAntitrustN.D. Tex.
Aug 12, 2025Filed 13mo agofiledGuardant Health, Inc. v. Tempus AI, Inc.ActivePatentD. Del.
Jun 23, 2025Filed 15mo agofiledTucker v. Apple (Siri AI)ActiveSecuritiesN.D. Cal.
Jun 9, 2025Filed 16mo agofilediyO v. OpenAI (io trademark)ActivePatentN.D. Cal.
Caption and links

Apple Inc. v. Masimo Corporation

Full docket on CourtListener

Lawsuit updates by email

Tuesdays, only in weeks with rulings, filings or hearings in data and AI cases.

Double opt-in. Unsubscribe any time.