Lawsuitsby GlyphApple v. Masimo (D. Del.) patent case
Brought by
v.
Defendants
Apple accused the Masimo W1 watch of infringing Apple utility and design patents; Masimo countersued for monopolization and patent infringement.
The case
- Court
- US District Court, District of Delaware
- Docket
- 1:22-cv-01377
- Filed
- Oct 20, 2022
- Status
- ActiveMasimo counterclaims still to be tried.
- Outcome
- A jury found in October 2024 that a discontinued Masimo watch and charger infringed two Apple design patents and awarded $250.
- Amount
- $250
History
1 dated entryComplaint filed: Apple Inc. v. Masimo CorporationSource
Related cases
Hendrix sued v. 
AppleAuthors Grady Hendrix and Jennifer Roberson allege Apple trained its OpenELM and Apple Intelligence models on pirated books from the Books3 dataset; later consolidated with Martinez-Conde and Alexander v. Apple.Further case management conferenceN.D. Cal.filed Sep 2025Nokia Technologies OY sued v. 
Aylo Holdings S. r.l.Sued for patent infringement.E.D. Tex.
Databricks, Inc. sued v. Nom Nom Data Inc.Asks the court for a declaratory judgment.N.D. Cal.PulseLink Systems, LLC sued v. 
Zoom Communications, Inc.Sued for patent infringement.D. Del.
Micron Technology, Inc. sued v. Netlist, Inc.Sued for patent infringement.D. Del.Netlist, Inc. sued v. Micron Technology, Inc.Sued for patent infringement.C.D. Cal.AlmondNet, Inc. sued v. 
Adobe Inc.Sued for patent infringement.N.D. Cal.Unwired Global Systems LLC sued v. 
SAP America, Inc.Sued for patent infringement.D. Del.